FREE FLIGHT, NEXT GEN & FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

Top on the aviation industries wishlist is the idea of "Free Flight" where aircraft will be guided by satellite-guided instruments in the cockpit rather than by ground based radar which requires more assistance by air traffic controllers. It is important to understand the concept of "Free Flight " and the equipment & technology needed to make air travel under free flight both safe and responsible "NextGen."

"NEXT GEN"

Next Gen is what the FAA refers to the suite of technology products that will make "Free Flight" safe. Next Gen is essentially technology that enables planes to self-seperate from other aircraft and chart their own path from departure to arrival destination. Unfortunatly the FAA is several years behind schedule on this and have yet to agree on the final suite of products to include as Next Gen. Part of the delay is caused by the long approvals process and high cost which are met with industry pressure.

"NOW GEN"

Some of the technology from Next Gen is already installed on Airplanes to enable some aspects of "Free Flight". It's part of a suite of products that the FAA now calls "Now Gen." It includes ADS-B RPN / RNAV. Not all aircraft have this technology but many do. Aircraft equipped with this technology want to make the use of it now... hence the term "Now Gen."

To update airports for "Now Gen" they need to approve new landing procedures for "Now Gen" equipped aircraft. RPN and STAAR and RNAV for fanned departures

According to the FAA, RNAV and RPN are the cornerstone to NOW GEN

RNAV enables aircraft to fly on any desired flight path within the coverage of ground- or spaced-based navigation aids, within the limits of the capability of the self-contained systems, or a combination of both capabilities. As such, RNAV aircraft have better access and flexibility for point-to-point operations.
What Is RNP?

RNP is RNAV with the addition of an onboard performance monitoring and alerting capability. A defining characteristic of RNP operations is the ability of the aircraft navigation system to monitor the navigation performance it achieves and inform the crew if the requirement is not met during an operation. This onboard monitoring and alerting capability enhances the pilot’s situation awareness and can enable reduced obstacle clearance or closer route spacing without intervention by air traffic control.

SAFETY & LEGALITY

Unfortunately "Free Flight" is years away from being safe and legal. It's not yet safe because many aircraft do not yet have the new technology. It's also not legal below 3000 feet due to Clean Air Act requirements. Many experts also believe that satellite-guided travel will never be safe because of the limitations of satellite-guided technology: Interference. equipment failure. According to these professionals commercial aviation will never be able to fully depart from ground based radar due to disaster preparedness.

A legislative loophole exists which allows commercial aviation companies to dynamically redesign the airspace above 3000 feet without involving communities or conducting impact studies. Previous to this policy change and technological enhancement the FAA dictated with a fair amount of precision the routes the aircraft could fly (Ground based Radar). If they wanted to change the routes, they would need to notify all the impacted communities and produce an exhaustive environmental Impact Statement.

The new legislation basically allows commercial aircraft to fly anywhere they please, regardless of environmental impact. With the Aviation Deregulation Act the FAA was saddled with much less responsibility, authority or accountability to abate aviation impacts. The only restrictions outlined under the Aviation Noise Abatement Act of 1979 defer to localities who adopt under their planning and zoning noise abatement programs.

FLYOVER FEES NUISANCE CLAIMS & RESTITUTION

"Free Flight" may also give rise to nuisance claims, flyover fees and restitution claims by areas impacted by the new routes due to noise and aviation emissions.

Under Free Flight, Aircraft will fly in routes determined by Satellite guided software much like a GPS system in your car guides you to your destination by suggesting which roads to take, only there are no roads in the Free Flight Program. Just basically a straight line from Point A to Point B. Under the Free Flight concept, an aircraft taking off at LaGuardia would be directed on a new route to it's destination- Fort Lauderdale. That new route could be right over your home that you purchased well outside the envelope of aviation noise for top dollar. You would now enjoy the aviation noise and emission from every plane flying from LaGuardia to Fort Lauderdale. Unless your locality adopted under it's charter with planning and zoning regulations a noise mitigation program, you will have no way to file an injunction against the use of this airspace.

Aircraft operating under the "Free Flight" traveling above 3000 feet are exempt from having to produce an environmental impact study thanks to a law in 2003 which exempts the FAA from producing an impact statement for airspace redesign.

If aircraft are expected to routinely create noise nuisance above 65 DBL average, or if the impact zone falls within an avigational aesement then nuisance claims can be made against airports and operators which could impact flight operations.

RESEARCH ON FREE FLIGHT

NASA, MITRE CORP, DOD, and the FAA have done enormous research in the Free Flight concept to enable the Aviation Industry to safely increase capacity while moving towards a satellite guided technology. The following is reprinted from NASA.

NASA STAR PROGRAM STUDIES EXERPT

AIR TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY
Includes passenger and cargo air transport operations; airport ground operations; flight safety and hazards; and aircraft accidents. Systems and hardware specific to ground operations of aircraft and to airport construction are covered in 09 Research and Support Facilities (Air). Air traffic control is covered in 04 Aircraft Communications and Navigation. For related information see also 16 Space Transportation and Safety and 85 Technology Utilization and Surface Transportation.

20040095940 Mitre Corp., McLean, VA, USA
Exploration of Terminal Procedures Enabled by NASA Wake VAS Technologies
Lunsford, Clark R.; Smith, Arthur P., III; Cooper, Wayne W., Jr.; Mundra, Anand D.; Gross, Amy E.; Audenaerd, Laurence F.; Killian, Bruce E.; August 2004; 136 pp.; In English
Contract(s)/Grant(s): DTFA01-01-C-00001;
NASA Order L-17121; 727-01-26
Report No.(s): NASA/CR-2004-213023; No Copyright; Avail:
CASI; A07, Hardcopy

http://202.118.250.135/nasa/STAR/star0419.pdf

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) tasked The MITRE Corporation’s Center for Advanced Aviation System Development (CAASD) to investigate potential air traffic control (ATC) procedures that could benefit from technology used or developed in NASA’s Wake Vortex Advisory System (WakeVAS). The task also required developing an estimate of the potential benefits of the candidate procedures. The main thrust of the investigation was to evaluate opportunities for improved capacity and efficiency in airport arrival and departure operations. Other procedures that would provide safety enhancements were also considered. The purpose of this investigation was to provide input to the WakeVAS program office regarding the most promising areas of development for the program. A two-fold perspective was desired: First, identification of benefits from possible procedures enabled by both incremental components and the mature state of WakeVAS technology; second identification of procedures that could be expected to evolve from the current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) procedures. The evolution of procedures should provide meaningful increments of benefit and a low risk implementation of the WakeVAS technologies.
Author
Air Traffıc Control; Vortex Advisory System; Technology Utilization

Please see items to note marked in RED as issues to further research and investigate


OVERVIEW OF FREE FLIGHT

According to the co-designer of the National Airspace System:

  1. Under National Airspace Redesign, commercial air traffic will freely transit airspace currently reserved for military use. The impact will be greatest near large population centers on the east and west coasts, and will affect many major range/airspace complexes. The DoD Policy Board on Federal Aviation met in March and approved the creation of a flag-level joint DoD/DoT oversight group to address issues associated with allowance of free-flight navigation of commercial aircraft.
  2. Goal: To safely enable major increases in the capacity and productivity of the National Airspace System (NAS), in all weather conditions, through the development of revolutionary operations systems and vehicle concepts.

    NASA research will provide:

    * Safe, clear-weather airport capacity in instrument-weather conditions
    * Hardware and software decision support tools to enable the "free flight" concept in the NAS
    * Critical technologies to enable scheduled civil tiltrotor service, to add capacity and reduce delays

    FAA research will provide:

    * Surveillance, navigation and landing applications of Global Positioning System technology
    * Enhanced aviation weather forecasting capabilities-knowing accurately when and where aviation weather hazards will occur
    * Insight into the future roles of pilots and controllers as the NAS evolves towards free flight
    * Redesign of the nation's airspace and airport approaches/departures to fully utilize the advances of technology
    * Automation tools to support collaborative decision making between air carriers and the FAA and to allow more flexible flight planning
    * Exploration of new wake vortex detection and tracking technology
  3. Introduction
    The current air transportation system in the United States is experiencing significant delays, decreased efficiency, and increased costs. This is especially true during adverse weather conditions. Over the next 20 years, the demand for air travel is expected to double, making these problems much more severe unless new capabilities are developed and made operational. To assure that these problems do not become reality, major new improvements to the air transportation system are required. NASA and the FAA are collaborating in these efforts to ensure the efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the future National Airspace System.

    Airplane taxing down runway
    Airplane lined up on the taxiway awaiting take-off.

    Goal: To safely enable major increases in the capacity and productivity of the National Airspace System (NAS), in all weather conditions, through the development of revolutionary operations systems and vehicle concepts.

    NASA research will provide:

    * Safe, clear-weather airport capacity in instrument-weather conditions
    * Hardware and software decision support tools to enable the "free flight" concept in the NAS
    * Critical technologies to enable scheduled civil tiltrotor service, to add capacity and reduce delays

    FAA research will provide:

    * Surveillance, navigation and landing applications of Global Positioning System technology
    * Enhanced aviation weather forecasting capabilities-knowing accurately when and where aviation weather hazards will occur
    * Insight into the future roles of pilots and controllers as the NAS evolves towards free flight
    * Redesign of the nation's airspace and airport approaches/departures to fully utilize the advances of technology
    * Automation tools to support collaborative decision making between air carriers and the FAA and to allow more flexible flight planning
    * Exploration of new wake vortex detection and tracking technology

    FAA POC:
    Steven J. Brown
    202-267-7111

    NASA POC:
    Dr. J. Victor Lebacqz
    650-604-5792
    vlebacqz@mail.arc.nasa.gov

    Web Site:
    www.asc.nasa.gov

    Free Flight Phase I
    The FAA's Free Flight Phase I (FFP1) program will introduce modernization into the national airspace incrementally-taking a building block approach to fielding new system to provide benefits to users as soon as possible. The goal of FFP1 is to move toward free flight operations by deploying systems based on current R&D prototypes that provide core free flight capabilities. The result will be near-term realization of air traffic management capabilities that have early benefits for service provides and National Airspace System users. FFP1 products will be operational at selected facilities by the close of 2002.

    NASA has conducted the enabling research for 3 of the 5 tools under the FAA's Free Flight Phase 1 program.

    Traffic Management Advisor-Single Center
    Traffic Management Advisor-Single Center (TMA-SC) is based on the research and prototypes of NASA. As deployed under FFP1, TMA-SC provides enroute air traffic controllers and traffic management specialists with computer automation and graphical tools to coordinate arrival traffic. The TMA-SC reduces airspace system delays by enhancing arrival throughput and efficiency of air traffic operations in the extended terminal airspace surrounding major airports-without decreasing safety or increasing controller workload. Efficiency and throughput increases translate into fuel savings to airlines and reduced passenger delays to the public.

    Prototypes of TMA have been deployed at five airports, and will be deployed to eight ARTCCs. Remote TMA displays (with no processing or TMA interactive capability) will be deployed to TRACONs and adapted airport towers associated with each TMA site.

    American Airlines has expressed great interest in completing the deployment of TMA-SC.

    FAA POC:
    John Rekstad
    202-233-2107
    john.rekstad@faa.gov

    NASA POC:
    Dr. Heinz Erzberger
    650-604-5425
    herzberger@mail.arc.nasa.gov

    Web Site:
    www.ctas.arc.nasa.gov

    Surface Movement Advisor
    Surface Movement Advisor Free Flight Phase 1 (SMA FFP1) facilitates the sharing of aircraft arrival information with airlines to augment decision-making regarding the surface movement of aircraft.

    * Although the SMA concept is based on the NASA research, the SMA FFP1 implementation is significantly different from the NASA prototype currently in use at Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport.
    * Automated radar terminal system data is available to airlines so they will have predicted knowledge of aircraft arrival information that can be used to compute an aircraft's estimated touchdown time.
    * SMA FFP1 information has been available at Philadelphia International and Detroit Metropolitan Airports since mid-December 1998.
    * Future SMA FFP1 sites are: Chicago O'Hare, Dallas-Fort Worth, Newark, and Teterboro Airports.
    * SMA FFP1 is expected to enhance airline gate and ramp operations that could lead to prevention of gridlock and reduction of taxi delays.
    * Northwest Airlines is using one of FAA's proof of concept displays in their system operations center and reap tremendous benefit from it. NWA believes they can save between three and four aircraft diversions per week at Detroit Metropolitan Airport.

    FAA POC:
    202- 233-2106
    ken.klasinski@faa.gov

    NASA POC:
    Dr. Heinz Erzberger
    650-604-5425
    herzberger@mail.arc.nasa.gov

    Web Site:
    www.ctas.arc.nasa.gov

    USER Request Evaluation Tool
    The USER Request Evaluation Tool (URET) provides to air traffic controllers automatic conflict detection, trial planning for assistance with conflict resolution or user requests, conformance monitoring of current flight trajectory, and some electronic flight data capability.

    Through URET's strategic notification and trial planning capabilities, a controller has more lead time to assess traffic situations and identify appropriate conflict-free resolutions. The additional lead time allows a controller to properly assess and confidently approve more pilot-requested flight plan amendments, knowing they will be conflict-free. URET will be deployed incrementally to seven ARTCCs in order to incorporate functional improvements and user feedback.

    FAA POC:
    Tom Spellerberg
    202-233-2111
    tom.spellerberg@faa.gov

    Passive Final Approach Spacing Tool
    Passive Final Approach Spacing Tool (pFAST) is based on the research and prototypes of NASA. As deployed under Free Flight Phase 1, pFAST will provide decision-support and tactical management tools for TRACON controllers and Traffic Management Coordinators (TMCs). pFAST allows more efficient use of both arrival and departure runways during periods of peak load. It enhances the controllers' situation awareness, especially during heavy-demand periods. A NASA pFAST prototype is in use at the Dallas-Fort Worth TRACON. This will be replaced with the FAA's implementation of pFAST at Dallas-Fort Worth and several more TRACONs during FFP1. Remote pFAST displays (with no processing or pFAST interactive capability) will be deployed to adapted airport towers associated with each pFAST site.

    American Airlines has expressed great interest in completing the deployment of pFAST. The improved efficiencies translate to fuel savings and more on-time arrivals.

    FAA POC:
    John Rekstad
    202-233-2107
    john.rekstad@faa.gov

    NASA POC:
    Dr. Heinz Erzberger
    650-604-5425
    herzberger@mail.arc.nasa.gov

    Web Site:
    www.ctas.arc.nasa.gov

    Collaborative Decision Making
    The ability to forecast and share airport and airspace demand is constrained by the unavailability of up-to-date intent information from NAS users. As a result, the FAA and NAS users lack an accurate common situational awareness on which to base flight planning decisions and improve NAS utilization.

    The near term objectives for CDM are to:

    * Validate estimated reduction in delays resulting from increased information sharing across all airports in the U.S.
    * Evaluate and institutionalize new procedures that improve flight routing under severe weather avoidance conditions and congestion
    * Continue the expansion of joint FAA/Industry information exchange mechanisms
    * Release FAA real time sensor and resource status data to improve efficiency

    The FAA's Free Flight Phase 1 Special Program Office is addressing the goals and objectives of CDM by continuing to engage the user community to achieve the consensus capabilities articulated by RTCA. Specifically, FFP1 continues to interact with the operational community to ensure that all capabilities deployed address real operational concerns.

    FAA POC:
    Steve Alvania
    202-233-2142
    steve.alvania@faa.gov

    Safe Flight 21
    The Safe Flight 21 program is a joint government/industry initiative designed to demonstrate and validate, in a real-world environment, the capabilities of advanced communication, navigation, and surveillance, and air traffic procedures associated with free flight. The program will demonstrate the following free flight operational enhancements selected by RTCA, using automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) as an enabling technology:

    * Weather and other information in the cockpit.
    * Affordable means to reduce controlled flight into terrain (cfit)
    * Improved capability for approaches in low visibility conditions
    * Enhanced capability to see & avoid adjacent traffic
    * Enhanced capability to delegate aircraft separation authority to the pilot
    * Improved capability for pilots to navigate airport taxiways
    * Enhanced capability for controllers to manage aircraft and vehicular traffic on the airport surface
    * Surveillance coverage in nonradar airspace
    * Improved separation standards

    The Safe Flight 21 program will also take safety, efficiency, capacity, certification, pilot/controller situation awareness, human factors, spectrum, and affordability issues into account over the course of demonstrating these nine operational enhancements.

    The potential market for ADS-B implementation is huge. If ADS-B, FIS-B, and TIS-B are included in the NAS Architecture, over 10,000 aircraft and thousands of ground stations may need to be equipped. The international marketplace is just as large. Success of the Safe Flight 21 demonstrations are critical to opening these markets up.

    As an enabling technology, ADS-B will provide the means for airborne aircraft to broadcast their position to other aircraft and to ground stations. ADS-B avionics will periodically transmit aircraft location, altitude, velocity and other data derived from either GPS or flight instruments via a digital link. On-board aircraft, ADS-B information will be displayed on a multifunction display, such as a Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI). The intent of broadcasting this information is to increase the pilots' situational awareness of ADS-B equipped aircraft. ADS-B can also be used to provide air traffic controllers a consolidated picture of the controlled airspace. The information provided to controllers will be more frequently updated than that provided by other surveillance equipment. In addition, ADS-B can be used as the enabling technology for Flight Information ServicesÜBroadcast (FIS-B) and Traffic Information ServicesÜBroadcast (TIS-B), which will allow weather and other data available on the ground to be provided to the cockpit. As a result, ADS-B capabilities have the potential to significantly increase flight safety, system capacity, and overall efficiency of flight operations.

    The Safe Flight 21 program is based on the principle that government and industry will share in the development of a global air transportation system, as we move into the free flight era.

    * The FAA is collaborating with industry via RTCA to ensure that the scope, resources, schedule, and execution of the Safe Flight 21 program reflects government/industry consensus. The vehicle for this collaboration is the RTCA Safe Flight 21 Steering Committee, which includes representatives from the Aircraft Operators and Pilots Association (AOPA), Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), National Air Traffic Control Association (NATCA), Cargo Airline Association (CAA), U.S. Airways, United Airlines, Delta Airlines, and the FAA.
    * The FAA and the CAA are entering into a partnership to pool their resources, in a collaborative effort to conduct an operational evaluation of ADS-B capabilities in the Ohio Valley. The CAA began equipping its aircraft in late 1998 as a prelude to in-flight evaluations, focusing on the air-air use of the equipment for see and avoid applications. A subsequent operational evaluation, currently scheduled for Summer 1999, will employ both avionics and ground stations to demonstrate expected operational enhancements to be provided by ADS-B, including the broadcast of TIS and FIS information, and at the same time gather critical data on the three candidate ADS-B links (Mode Select (Mode S) Extended Squitter, and Universal Access Transceiver (UAT), VHF Data Link (VDL) Mode 4) and operational procedures.
    * The FAA is working with air carriers in the Bethel, Alaska region, through the "Capstone" initiative, to improve aviation safety while offering greater efficiencies to operators. "Capstone" will concentrate on the evaluation and implementation of three operational enhancements in the region: Weather and Other Information in the Cockpit, Affordable Means to Reduce CFIT, and Enhanced Capability to See and Avoid Adjacent Traffic. An initial operational evaluation is scheduled for Summer 1999, with limited equipage and subsequent operational evaluations following in 2000.
    * The FAA is working with United Airlines to evaluate Paired Approach and Runway Incursion Protection ADS-B applications at San Francisco. Simulation studies have been performed, and an operations concept is being developed; Further operational evaluations of these applications are currently in the planning stages.
    * The FAA has started soliciting inputs from major potential avionics providers on how to make ADS-B equipment affordable enough to promote wide-spread voluntary equipage.

    FAA POC:
    Richard Lay
    202-267-7768
    Richard.Lay@faa.gov

    Global Positioning System
    Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS)
    Wide Area Augmentation System

    The WAAS is a geographically broad augmentation to the basic GPS service designed to improve the accuracy, integrity, and availability of the basic GPS service. Initial benefits will be provided by Phase I WAAS.

    When Phase I is operational, WAAS will provide pilots with an en route through precision approach capability. Enroute through non-precision approaches will be available throughout entire service area with an availability of 99.9 percent. Precision approach coverage will be provided in central regions of the continental United States (CONUS) serving approximately 50 percent of CONUS airports. Availability for precision approach is designed to be 95 percent.

    Although WAAS offers the potential to replace Very-High-Frequency Omni-Directional Radar (VOR), Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), and Non-Directional Beacons (NDB) in the U.S., further enhancements are needed to the Phase I WAAS before this is possible.

    The commissioning of Phase I WAAS for public use will take place in the Fall of 2000; however, in mid-1999 a signal capable of supporting non-safety applications, such as an aid to Visual Flight Rule (VFR) flight, will be available.

    Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS)
    Wide Area Augmentation System

    The other augmentation to the basic GPS service is the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS). Similar to the WAAS concept, which incorporates the use of geostationary communication satellites to broadcast a correction message, the LAAS will broadcast its correction message via very high frequency (VHF) radio datalink from a ground-based transmitter.

    The LAAS will meet the more stringent Category II/III requirements that exist at selected locations throughout the U.S. LAAS is intended to complement the WAAS and function together to supply users of the U.S. National Airspace System (NAS) with seamless satellite-based navigation for all phases of flight. In practical terms, this means that at locations where the WAAS is unable to meet existing navigation and landing requirements (such as availability), the LAAS will be used to fulfill those requirements. In addition, beyond Category III, the LAAS will provide the user with a navigation signal that can be used as an all weather surface navigation capability. This will enable the potential use of LAAS as a component of a surface navigation system and an input to surface surveillance/traffic management systems. It is fully expected that the end-state configuration will pinpoint the aircraft's position to within one meter or less, and do so at a significant improvement in service flexibility and user operating costs.

    Additionally, both the WAAS and LAAS have the backing of aviation's main user groups-the Air Transport Association (ATA) representing air carriers, and the Aircraft Owner's and Pilot's Association (AOPA) representing general aviation. These groups confirmed their support in an April 1998 press release which stated-"the joint recommendations ask the Federal Aviation Administration to proceed with both wide-area and local-area augmentation systems for Global Positioning System (GPS) satellite navigation." Encouraged by these recommendations and the benefits that can be provided by WAAS and LAAS, the FAA remains strongly committed to these programs.

    FAA POC:
    Carl McCullough
    202-493-4722

    NASA: Beyond Free Flight Phase 1 Tools

    NASA is developing, with the help of FAA, new tools for even greater efficiency gains for the future National Aviation System:

    Free Flight Diagram
    Tools for Free Flight Phase I and Beyond

    * Active Final Approach Spacing Tool (aFAST): Active FAST is a decision support tool designed to achieve more accurate aircraft separation on final approach. As a follow-on to the previously developed and implemented Passive FAST, aFAST will provide active advisories, namely heading and speed. In addition, aFAST will generate sequencing and scheduling information. Expect 10% additional capacity improvement from pFAST.
    * Collaborative Arrival Planning (CAP): CAP is focused on improving air carrier hub operations. Today, arriving aircraft are handled on a first-come, first-serve basis, without regard to air carrier business concerns. Inevitably, air carrier arrival timing miscues, caused by aircraft maintenance, airport congestion, or severe weather, lead to air carrier inefficiencies, such as missed flight connections, inefficient hub operations, and aircraft diversions. Providing air carriers with improved predictive information on their arriving flights and the ability to alter arrival times to prevent timing miscues, are the principal objectives of CAP. The potential annual savings-$75M.
    o Enroute/Descent Advisor (E/DA): Enables conflict-free "direct-to" routing and fuel-efficient descent profiles for enroute and transition aircraft.
    o Expedite Departure Path (EDP): Provides speed, heading, and climb advisories providing unrestricted climb profiles, reduced near-airport fuel emissions, and increased airport capacity.
    o Surface Movement System (SMS): Builds from SMA to achieve additional reductions in surface delays and optimize surface movement, and enhance airport situational awareness of aircraft movements.

    NASA POC:
    Dr. Heinz Erzberger
    650-604-5425

    FAA: Beyond Free Flight Phase 1
    While FFP1 lays the foundation for addressing many of the efficiency problems of the National Airspace System (NAS), it does not address all of the user needs that will exist in the future. Many of these needs will be generated by the growth of air traffic in the U.S. and worldwide. According to the FAA, air traffic in the U.S. will grow steadily over the next decade. Activity at towered airports in the U.S. in 1998 exceeded 65 million operations. By 2010, the FAA estimates, this number will exceed 81 million.

    NASA is working hand-in-hand with FAA and its Federally Funded Research and Development Center (MITRE's Center for Advanced Aviation System Development) to address future air traffic Management (ATM) needs of the NAS. Air traffic management research and development continues to be a critical element of full modernization of the NAS as we move beyond FFP1. In both the near- and the long-term, the FAA is working to expand FFP1 capabilities geographically and to increase functionality. Building on the frame-work of FFP1, the FAA also seeks to increase the level of integration among various FFP1 components to achieve greater efficiencies, redesign the airspace, and add further procedural enhancements. Among current research and development efforts underway are:

    FAA Air Traffic Control Facility
    FAA Air Traffic Control Facility.

    * Flight Management System/Area Navigation Routing (FMS/RNAV)-will provide shorter paths to the runway to minimize flight time variations caused by vectoring and airport delays.
    This program utilizes advanced equipment in aircraft cockpits. (The figure below illustrates the route definition tool under development.)
    * Flow Management Restriction Reduction: Designed to reduce the level of restrictions in place in the NAS at any time. Analyses are being performed to determine which restrictions can be safely eliminated.
    * Enhanced En Route Conflict Resolution Capabilities: To assist controllers in constructing flight plans more quickly, especially in situations of heavy workload or complex traffic patterns. Work is underway to develop and evaluate this logic, building on existing URET capability.
    * Collaborative Decision Making (CDM): Continued research to better provide common information that enables traffic flow managers and airspace users to make more informed decisions. Multiple activities are underway to develop tools that will be needed beyond FFP1.
    * Operational Concept Development: Provides a structural set of relational responsibilities and actions for controllers, traffic flow managers, pilots, and users' operations centers to achieve a desired operational enhancement. The concept is used to define required procedures, information flows, communication bandwidths, and decision support systems required for the successful evolution of the NAS.
    * Traffic Flow Management Impact Assessment: Will assist traffic flow managers and airspace users in understanding the potential results of proposed TFM actions on a NAS-wide basis. A fast-time simulation capability is under evaluation to identify requirements and to develop a prototype capability.
    * Collaborative Routing Coordination Tools (CRCT): Provides information for traffic flow managers and airspace users to recognize, analyze, and resolve traffic flow problem situations. (The graphic below illustrates a small segment of CRCT capabilities.)

    FAA POC:
    Diane E. Boone
    703-883-5861
    dboone@mitre.org

    FAA's Aviation Weather Research Program
    The FAA's Aviation Weather Research (AWR) program focuses on mitigating the effects of winter weather, turbulence, inflight icing, ceiling and visibility, and convective weather on aviation. The AWR program provides more accurate and accessible weather observations, warnings, and forecasts. It is structured through a team approach to performing the research work. There are currently eight meteorological product development teams (PDTs), each targeted toward solving specific prioritized operational weather problems. Products are implemented on systems within the National Airspace System and on operational platforms of the National Weather Service (NWS).

    FAA POC:
    Dave Sankey
    202-366-8985
    dave.sankey@faa.gov

    Web Site:
    http://www.faa.gov/aua/awr

    Winter Weather Research
    Aircraft and runways require de-icing during winter weather conditions for safe operations. De-icing operations typically reduce the airport capacity by a factor of two, resulting in delays. Lack of accurate, real-time and forecast winter weather information results in unnecessary delays. Snowfall rate during previous de-icing accidents was found to be highly correlated with the liquid equivalent rate, rather than snow intensity based on visibility. Holdover times of de/anti-icing fluids (critical safety consideration) also correlate with liquid equivalent rate.

    The solution to these problems is WSDDM, a winter weather forecasting system that provides real-time and 30 minute forecasts of winter weather information, to include: liquid equivalent snowfall rates every minute and the vector location of snowbands every 30 minutes. WSDDM allows better planning for intense periods of de-icing , more effective use of de-icing fluids, improved decision making on holdover times, and greater shared situational awareness. These benefits as well as increased safety and capacity have been demonstrated at New York's LaGuardia, Denver International, and Chicago's O'Hare airports, and is presently operational at LaGuardia.

    WSDDM technology has recently been transferred to a commercial vendor that will make the system available to airlines and airports. Future research that will be incorporated into WSDDM includes improved detection and real-time reporting of precipitation rate and type; 1- to 12-hour forecasts of snow and other precipitation; detection and real-time reporting of in-flight icing and ceiling and visibility in the terminal area.

    FAA POC:
    Dave Sankey
    202-366-8985
    dave.sankey@faa.gov

    Turbulence
    Clear-air turbulence is hazardous to passengers, crew, and aircraft and is the number one cause of injuries in non-fatal plane accidents. Unexpected encounters can cause structural damage to the aircraft. Avoidance of light and moderate turbulence results in a more comfortable ride. Current forecast products give a broad view in time and space. Large regions potentially containing turbulence are warned. Forecasts are made every 6 hours, with updates triggered by pilot reports. Unfortunately, pilot reports are few and sometimes ambiguous.

    The program is investigating new methods of detecting turbulence, developing better algorithms and systems for 1- to 9-hour forecasts, and establishing innovative techniques for disseminating weather information.

    The AWR program has developed a means of getting quantitative turbulence measurements without the use of pilot reports, using a algorithm integrated in the ACMS software for commercial aircraft. It has been installed on several United Airlines' 737s and 757s, and will be installed on approximately 100 by the end of the physical year. ICAO has approved this in-situ algorithm as an international standard. This will result in aircraft being guided out of the way of clear air turbulence. Another product under development is the Integrated Turbulence Forecast Algorithm, which combines multiple. complex numbers of observations and diagnostic information into a more precise and accurate turbulence forecast product for use by commercial and general aviation.

    FAA POC:
    Dave Sankey
    202-366-8985
    dave.sankey@faa.gov

    SOCRATES
    Turbulence in the airspace system presents one of the greatest dangers and capacity constraints to air transportation. Project SOCRATES addresses technologies necessary for the development of sensors and instruments for the detection, location, and tracking of aircraft-generated wake turbulence, clear-air turbulence, and other related turbulence phenomena. Project SOCRATES applies acousto-optic techniques, previously developed for undersea warfare, to the detection of air turbulence hazards in aviation. Solutions for minimizing these hazards have been difficult to achieve in the past, in part due to the lack of sensors suitable for operational deployment. A solution to the wake turbulence problem will be required in any future airport capacity enhancements. An all-weather wake turbulence sensor capable of locating the vortices generated by landing or departing aircraft is essential.

    In 1998, an early SOCRATES system was installed at JFK airport where it demonstrated its ability to detect acoustic signals from aircraft wake vortices. It has since been recommended that the SOCRATES project support the planned closely spaced parallel runways at the San Francisco International airport. The FAA is working closely with NASA and other partners (Volpe National Transportation Systems Center and Lincoln Laboratories) to research and validate the SOCRATES sensor technology.

    FAA POC:
    Dr. George C. Greene
    757-864-1905
    g.c.greene@larc.nasa.gov

    In-Flight Icing
    In-flight icing is a factor in numerous fatal aircraft accidents and causes significant disruption to domestic flight operations. Current products do not adequately control these dangerous and disruptive events. Avoidance of in-flight icing would be possible with improved high-resolution forecasts of aircraft icing conditions.

    The solution is the
    in-flight icing diagnosis algorithm, IIDA, which presents a gridded depiction of current or forecast in-flight icing. The IIDA depictions include icing characteristics, such as severity and type and the probability of icing in a specified region and is currently available on the aviation digital data service at the Aviation Weather Center. Recently, IIDA was demonstrated/evaluated successfully for the regional airlines, Air Wisconsin and Atlantic Coast Airlines. Other recent successes in the in-flight icing program include:

    * A collaborative research effort with NASA Glenn Research Center on supercooled large droplet research produced improved diagnosis and forecasting and documented the severe aircraft performance degradation in freezing rain. The results will be used to develop specifications for de-icing and anti-icing equipment.
    * Remote icing sensing methods developed in the FAA-supported Winter Icing and Storms project will be evaluated at Mt. Washington Observatory (NH) this spring.

    Benefits to the Aviation Community:

    * More accurate and timely information for flight planning and icing avoidance
    * Detailed routing by flight dispatchers is possible using higher-resolution IIDA output
    * Remote sensor research to lead to ground-based terminal area or airborne ice detection systems

    FAA POC:
    Dave Sankey
    202-366-8985
    dave.sankey@faa.gov

    Ceiling and Visibility
    Marine stratus, trapped cool, humid air from sea breezes, in the San Francisco Bay area cause frequent low ceilings at San Francisco International Airport (SFO). During these events, the airport cannot use independent parallel approaches and imposes delay programs to regulate the arrivals. The SFO has the highest number of imposed delay programs in the United States. Marine stratus is also a problem at other major coastal airports.

    Operational analysis shows that most of the unnecessary delay and a significant portion of the holding could be eliminated if the Traffic Management Unit has accurate 1-hour forecasts of the onset and burnoff of the Marine Stratus. The approach taken is to improve the forecasting capability of the Center Weather Service Unit by providing additional weather information that is critical for better forecasts and an automated forecast guidance system.

    Studies indicate that up to one-quarter of the summer delay at SFO would be eliminated by an accurate 1-hour forecast of the time of burnoff.
    A successful product could annually save $7M of air carrier costs at SFO. In addition, techniques developed will provide the foundation for ceiling and visibility products for several other high-impact coastal airports.

    FAA POC:
    Dave Sankey
    202-366-8985
    dave.sankey@faa.gov

    Aviation Digital Data Service
    Accurate, timely and user-friendly forecasts of icing, turbulence, thunderstorms, and clouds are required to support flight operations. The Aviation Digital Data Service (ADDS) enables aviation decision-makers to easily and inexpensively acquire graphics, text, and grids of the latest weather observations and forecasts of icing, turbulence, and thunderstorms.

    The first version of ADDS is being operated and maintained by the National Weather Service's Aviation Weather Center located in Kansas City, Kansas. This version enables users to access both standard and experimental aviation weather information. Among the experimental information are forecasts of clouds and turbulence. The next version of ADDS will generate graphics of forecasts of icing, turbulence, clouds and thunderstorms for specific flight routes requested by users.

    ADDS is a very cost-effective method of enabling aviation decision-makers and automation systems to acquire up-to-the-minute weather observations and state-of the-art forecasts based on techniques developed by the FAA AWR Program and operated by the NWS. The digital format of ADDS facilitates interaction among computers, a key requirement to support free flight. To get timely, accurate, user-friendly aviation weather information via the internet, go to http://adds.awc-kc.noaa.gov/

    FAA POC:
    Dave Sankey
    202-366-8985
    dave.sankey@faa.gov

    Convective Weather
    Convective weather is the primary cause of national airspace delay and is the cause of half of the serious turbulence injuries. Existing operational forecast products are limited, only providing 10- and 20-min extrapolated positions of storms with no accounting for storm evolution and only hourly updates of the manually created Convective Segments.

    If users had accurate, automated 1- to 2-hour forecasts of storms, they could use the airspace more efficiently and thus reduce delays. Longer-term (2 to 6 hr) national forecasts are needed for flight planning and traffic flow management.

    The solution is to take advantage of FAA-funded research conducted on thunderstorm evolution to provide fully automated storm predictions 1- to 2-hours in advance. The FAA is demonstrating two automated forecast products tailored to user needs, and plans to continue to improve them based on user feedback. The Terminal Convective Weather Demonstration at Dallas/Ft. Worth International Airport, begun in March 1998, provides the first automated 1-hour forecast operation. For information contact: webmaster@wx.ll.mit.edu for user-id and password.

    June 1998, the FAA began a National Convective Weather Demonstration, which provides enroute advisories of convective weather to airline dispatchers via a webpage interface at: http://www.rap.ucar.edu/projects/awc/awc.html.

    FAA POC:
    Dave Sankey
    202-366-8985
    dave.sankey@faa.gov

    NASA Aviation Weather Technology Improvements
    Atlanta Demonstration Technologies
    Atlanta Demonstration Technologies.

    NASA's Low Visibility Landing and Surface Operations (LVLASO) program is developing technology to improve the safety and efficiency of aircraft movements on the surface during landing, roll-out, turnoff, and taxi operations.

    A flight demonstration of a prototype LVLASO system was conducted in August 1997 at the Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport in cooperation with the FAA. Both airborne and ground-based components were integrated to provide the flight crew and controllers with additional information to enable safe, expedient surface operations. This demonstration validated the concept and enabled assessment of technology performance in an operational environment.

    Technologies demonstrated included:

    Airborne

    * Moving map display
    * Head-Up Display
    * Data links Global Positioning System

    Ground-based

    * Surface surveillance systems
    * Airport traffic identification
    * Data links
    * Air Traffic Control (ATC) interface

    Benefits

    * Supplemental guidance cues and increased situational awareness
    * Runway incursion avoidance
    * Low visibility surface navigation
    * Reduced runway occupancy time and improved braking efficiency
    * Reduced controller/pilot misunderstandings (visual display of ATC instructions)
    * Improved situational awareness in low visibility
    * Reduced controller/pilot misunderstandings (parallel electronic instruction transmissions)

    NASA POC:
    Steve Young
    757-864-1709
    s.d.young@larc.nasa.gov

    Web Site:
    http://tnasa.larc.nasa.gov/lvlaso

    Airborne Information for Lateral Spacing
    Now, instrument meteorological conditions routinely reduce the capacity of closely spaced parallel runways less than 4,300 feet apart. These capacity losses result in landing delays and inconveniences to the traveling public, interruptions in commerce, and increased operating costs to the airlines.

    The Airborne Information for Lateral Spacing (AILS) concept uses flight-deck-centered technology to enable approaches in instrument meteorological conditions to runways spaced as close as 2,500 feet. There are two aspects to the concept: (1) provide accurate flight path management and (2) provide monitoring, alerts, and procedures in the event of an intrusion.

    A joint NASA/Honeywell flight test is planned at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility in August 1999. A demonstration at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport will follow in September 1999.

    NASA POC:
    Wayne Bryant
    757-864-1690

    Aircraft Vortex Spacing System
    AVOSS Facilities
    AVOSS Facilities at the DFW International Airport.

    NASA's Aircraft Vortex Spacing System (AVOSS) provides weather-dependent wake vortex spacing criteria for maximizing airport capacity while maintaining safety. An AVOSS concept demonstration will be performed at the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport in 2000, where an initial version of AVOSS is currently installed.

    The AVOSS technology has the potential to reduce takeoff delays as well as increase single-runway throughput by 10 percent or more during conditions requiring instrument approaches. AVOSS project results are being explored for application to proposed instrument parallel runway operations at the San Francisco International Airport.

    NASA is responsible for the scientific development of AVOSS, research system integration, and concept demonstration. The FAA and industry will establish safety criteria and implementation priorities. The FAA is developing a plan to facilitate AVOSS technology transfer to the operational environment. Partners and supporters include the FAA, Air Transport Association, Boeing, the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, Lincoln Laboratory, Transport Canada, and Volpe National Transportation System Center.

    NASA POC:
    David Hinton
    757-864-2040

    Web Site:
    http://avsp.larc.nasa.gov/avoss

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY vs. NEXT GEN/ FREE FLIGHT

Environmentalists are concerned that Environmetnal law is being violated by the concept of Free Flight. This is due to the emissions and noise produced as a byproduct of jet engine travel. NEPA serves to protect resources below 3000 feet where aviation emissions are mixed with ground level air.

  1. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA - 42 U.S.C. s/s 4321 et seq. 1969) is the basic national charter for protection of the environment. The Environmental Impact and Analysis Process implements NEPA and is followed to analyze proposed actions and identify environmental impacts. The Clean Air Act (CAA) established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) in order to protect the health and general welfare of the public.

    NEPA (pronounced KNEE-PA) was one of the first federal laws enacted that established a broad framework for federal agencies to use in ensuring that their actions do not have an adverse affect on the environment. NEPA's basic policy is to assure that all branches of the federal government give proper consideration to the environment prior to undertaking any major action which significantly affects the environment. NEPA requirements are invoked when airports, buildings, military complexes, highways, parkland purchases, and other such federal activities are proposed. Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements, which are assessments of the likelihood of impacts from alternative courses of action, are required from all federal agencies and are the most visible NEPA requirements. It is the policy of the National Guard to fully comply with the requirements of NEPA.

    The primary drivers for pollution prevention programs are Executive Orders (EOs) 12856 and 13101. In particular, EO 12856 directs all federal agencies to comply with the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) and the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA). This executive order emphasizes that the Federal Government must demonstrate pollution prevention leadership by improving facility management, incorporating environmental principles in acquisition practices, establishing comprehensive P2 Plans, and developing innovative technologies.

DOT INSTRUCTIONS TO FAA

Commercial space transportation is not explicitly included in the current NAS concept of operations. However, FAA’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) is working with other lines of business to include commercial space transportation in subsequent versions of NAS architecture. As a first step, FAA will complete, in 1998, a draft Space and Air Traffic Management System (SATMS) design plan. SATMS will be an evolutionary expansion and enhancement of the air traffic management system that will include commercial space transportation as an integral component.

The FAA is acquiring the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) and the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) to accelerate NAS modernization as much as possible. WAAS will reach Initial Operational Capability (IOC) in 1999 and LAAS recently received approval to proceed with system development.

One of the issues facing the FAA is the significance of radio frequency interference to GPS receivers. Studies and tests are underway to define the problem further and to develop procedural and technical countermeasures.

FAA is an active participant in numerous international forums that involve the acceptance and use of the GPS internationally. FAA has agreements with 14 nations that ensure the use of U.S. GPS standards throughout the world. For example, FAA has conducted live WAAS tests with Canada, Mexico and Italy to demonstrate the interoperability of GPS navigation systems. FAA leadership in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Global Navigation Satellite System Panel (GNSSP), Radio Technical Communication Association (RTCA) and the Civil Service Interface Committee (CSIC) is maintained at a high level to ensure U.S. interests in a seamless GPS-based world-wide system are selected as the international standard.

http://www.dot.gov/affairs/whcsec2.htm

Free Flight Links

IFly. iFly is a research project within the 6th Framework Programme FP6-2005-Aero-4 (Priority 1.3.1.4.g Aeronautics and Space), funded by the European Commission under contract number TREN/07/FP6AE/S07.71574/037180. airborne self separation has been "invented" as a potential solution for high density airspace. iFly aims to develop a step change in this
trend, through a systematic exploitation and further development of the advanced mathematical techniques that have emerged within the HYBRIDGE project of EC's 5th Framework Programme.

Free Flight Systems an international supplier of professional grade avionics system solutions for commercial and military aircraft, was the first company to certify an airborne WAAS receiver. Founded in 2001 through the acquisition of Trimble’s avionics products division, FreeFlight Systems specializes in the design, development, and production of GPS navigation management systems, GPS/WAAS sensors, and radar altimeters. Operating from our FAA certified design, manufacturing, and repair center in Waco, Texas, we serve our avionics customers with retrofit and OEM applications.

Fly Next Gen Blog is an infomative look at the Satellite Guided Technology (Next Gen) that is needed to get to the Free Flight Concept. This is an industry perspective on the parts of Next Gen.

Development Advisory Groups involved in Free Flight Initiative NAR

  1. NAS Architecture Core Group
  2. FAA’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST)
  3. Radio Technical Communication Association (RTCA) Task Force
  4. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
  5. Global Navigation Satellite System Panel (GNSSP)
  6. Civil Service Interface Committee (CSIC)
  7. Department of Transportation (DOD)
  8. Department of Defence (DOT)
  9. ATO
  10. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
  11. FAA’s FDMS development group
  12. JDPO
    • Weather Working Group
    • Security Working Group
  1. RTCA Safe Flight 21 Steering Committee:
    • Aircraft Operators and Pilots Association (AOPA)
    • Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA)
    • National Air Traffic Control Association (NATCA)
    • Cargo Airline Association (CAA)
    • U.S. Airways, United Airlines
    • Delta Airlines
    • FAA.

References & Further Reading

  1. http://www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/events/showcase/efficien.htm
  2. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/environment.htm
  3. http://www.fas.org/spp/military/program/nav/tf-rpt.htm
  4. http://www.tc.faa.gov/acf/FAA_Flight_Plan.pdf
  5. http://www.usa-federal-forms.com/usa-fedforms-dod-opnavinst/dod-opnavinst-3721-5k-nonfillable.pdf
  6. http://blog.flynextgen.com/
  7. http://www.dot.gov/affairs/whcsec2.htm
  8. Excerpts from Free Flight provided by DOD.
  9. Alignment with the SESAR programme by René Verbeek and Silvie Luisa Brázdilová
    iFly presented to the Second ATM R&D project Cocordination and Networking Meeting
    Brussels, November 14, 2007
  10. Self-separation research at NASA with Airspace and Aircraft view recording at 10X playback speed by David Wing
  11. First iFly project progress meeting 2007
    Parades, Rome, November 14, 2007
  12. Modelling and Analysis of Safety Risk in Air Traffic Design by Henk Blom
    ITW Symposium 2007: Industriële en Toegepaste Wiskunde Symposium, Industrial and Applied Mathematics Symposium
    NLR, Amsterdam, September 28, 2007
  13. iFly project: Airborne Self Separation as basis for advanced en route ATM by Henk Blom
    5th ASAS-TN2 workshop 2007: "Equipping for ASAS: Ground and Airborne Industries"
    Toulouse, France, September 17-19, 2007
  14. Estimation of rare event probability in stochastic hybrid systems by J. Krystul, H. Blom and A. Bagchi
    ICSPA 2007: International Conference on Stochastic Processes and Applications
    Bangalore, India, July 6-12, 2007

CONTACTS FOR NEXT GEN


Agency players:
Mark Andrews - Federal Chair, Weather Working Group, JPDO
Kristen Burnham - Portfolio Management Division Director, FAA
William Davis - Representative for Space and Aeronautics, White House Office of Science and

Technology Policy
Michael B. Donley - Secretary (Acting), Department of Defense
Vincent Capezzutto - Director, Surveillance and Broadcast Services Office, FAA
Tyler D. Duvall - Under Secretary for Policy (Acting), Department of Transportation
Charles R Everett Jr. - Manager, Airports Nat’l Planning Division, FAA
Yuri Gawdiak - Interagency Portfolio and Systems Analysis Division, NASA
Peggy Gervasi - Policy Division Director, FAA
Mary Glackin - Deputy Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere, Department of Commerce/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Mike Golden - Assistant Administrator, Operational Process & Technology, Chief Information Officer and Chief Technology Officer, TSA, Department of Homeland Security
Michael D. Griffin - Administrator, NASA
David Kerr - Partnership Management Division Director, FAA
Hank Krakowski - ATO Chief Operating Officer, FAA
Charles A. Leader - Director, JPDO
Jim Linney - Project Manager, SBS Central Service Area, FAA
John Marburger III - Director, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
Jay Merkle - Chief Architect, FAA
Robert Pearce - Deputy Director, JPDO
Gerald F. Pease - Executive Director, DoD Policy Board on Federal Aviation, Department of Defense
Mary E. Peters - Secretary, Department of Transportation
Paul Polski - Director of Strategic Planning and Policy, Operational Process and Technology, TSA, Security Working Group Co-Chair, JPDO, Department of Homeland Security
Herman A. Rediess - Director of Transition, Explosives Division, Science and Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security
Claire Robinson - Business Management Division Director, FAA
Michael Romanowski - Director, NextGen Integration & Implementation, FAA
Nick Sabatini - Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety, FAA
Robie Samanta-Roy - Assistant Director for Space Aeronautics, White House Office of Science and

Technology Policy
Paul A. Schneider - Deputy Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Jaiwon Shin - Associate Administrator of Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, NASA
Robert Sturgell - Administrator (Acting), FAA
John J. Sullivan - Deputy Secretary, Department of Commerce
Pete Verga - Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs, Department of Defense
Edgar G. Waggoner - Enterprise Architecture and Engineering Division Director, NASA

The NextGen Institute Management Council:
Ed Bolen - National Business Aviation Association
*Phil Boyer - Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association
Peter J. Bunce - General Aviation Manufacturers Association
Roger Cohen - Regional Airline Association
Bill Connors - National Business Travel Association
*Pete Dumont- Air Traffic Control Association
Pat Forrey- National Air Traffic Control Association
Steve Hampton - Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
*Paul G. Kaminski - Aerospace Industries Association
Charles Leader - Joint Planning and Development Office
*James C. May - Air Transport Association
Henry Ogrodzinski - National Association of State Aviation Officials
*John Prater- Air Line Pilots Association
Greg Principato - Airports Council International - North America
Margaret Jenny - Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics
Matt Zuccaro - Helicopter Association International
*Executive Committee Member

NextGen Management Board
Ruth Leverenz - Deputy Administrator (acting)
Hank Krakowski - ATO Chief Operating Officer
Nick Sabatini - Associate Administrator, Aviation Safety
Catherine Lang - Deputy Associate Administrator, Airports
Paula Lewis - Acting Assistant Administrator, Regions and Center Operations
Ramesh Punwani - Assistant Administrator, Financial Services/Chief Financial Officer
Dan Elwell - Assistant Administrator, Aviation Policy Planning & Environment
David Bowen - Assistant Administrator, Information Services & Chief Information Officer
Eugene Juba - ATO Senior Vice President, Financial Services
Victoria Cox - ATO Senior Vice President, NextGen and Operations Planning Services
Rick Day - ATO Vice President, En Route and Oceanic Services
Bruce Johnson - ATO Vice President, Terminal Services
Nancy Kalinowski - ATO Vice President, System Operations Services
Steve Zaidman - ATO Vice President, Technical Operations Services
Robert Tarter - ATO Vice President, Safety Services
Michael Romanowski - Director, NextGen Implementation and Integration Office
Fred Pease - Department of Defense Liaison
Agam Sinha - MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development
Charles Leader - Director, Joint Planning and Development Office
Patrick Forrey - President, National Air Traffic Controllers Association
Tom Brantley - President, Professional Aviation Safety Specialists

NextGen Review Board
Michael Romanowski - Director, NextGen Integration and Implementation Office (co-chair)
Charles Leader - Director, JPDO (co-chair)
John McGraw - Office of Aviation Safety, Flight Standards Service
Ben DeLeon - Office of Airports
Angela Freeman - Office of Regions and Center Operations
Robert Nassif - Office of Budget
Nan Shellabarger - Office of Aviation Policy, Planning and Environment
Luis Ramirez - ATO En Route and Oceanic Services
Rich Jehlen - ATO Systems Operation Services
Raul Trevino - ATO Terminal Services
Jim Eck - ATO Technical Operations
Maria DiPasquantonio - ATO Financial Services
Jim Williams - ATO Operations Planning, System Engineering
Huan Nguyen - ATO Safety Services
Lourdes Maurice - Office of Environment and Energy
Joe Sinnott - MITRE
Kris Burnham - FAA, ATO-F
Jay Merkle - JPDO, Chief Architect
Jesse Wijntjes - FAA Chief Architect
Diana Young - Office of Information Services
Gisele Mohler - Director, NextGen Planning Staff
Art Politano - Office of Aviation Safety, Air Traffic Safety Oversight
Dan Murphy - ATO Operations Planning, Performance Analysis

OurAirspace
ourairspace.org
contact@OurAirspace.org